🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager endured a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Over System & Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style of play “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not really responsible for the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Football: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the system coach only to fire him for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then discard him for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.